I’ve just got off a great call with @FranciscoCM at Replit, where we discussed some of the current issues. Whilst I have been one of the first to say that these last 7 days have not been Replit’s finest (not least their silence), I feel reassured that they are listening and aware of what is going on, and are very much heads-down working on sorting things out.
Key issue
As per Amjad’s recent post on X, a core issue seems to be centered around agent 3 looking at agent 2 code and deciding to let rip and improve/change it. Once it was described to me, this kind of made sense.
As an analogy, any experienced developers reading this will probably agree that they’d rather start an app from scratch than try and get their head round another developer’s code! I personally come out in a cold sweat if I am made to look at someone elses code ![]()
If we ask agent 3 to build something from scratch, it will probably do a great job (has anyone done this yet???).
But,… if we ask agent 3 to work with agent 2’s code, then, like human developers, it is going a bit crazy - sending the architect and testing tools in to rip up the code and rewrite it in its own style.
I have summarised, but this scenario makes sense to me; I’d love to know if it resonates with others too?
Agent personalities
I also commented to Francisco that I have found agent 3’s “personality” and style of working very different to agent 2’s. In much the same way as ChatGPT 5 felt very different to ChatGPT 4-o - and was equally slammed on social media.
It feels odd to talk about agent personalities, and maybe that is the wrong word. But something changes with these big AI upgrades, which means we have to alter how we prompt the agents and modify our workflows to suite different kinds of agent responses.
Tell me if this makes sense to you? (or am I just going mad
)
Please give your feedback to Replit
I feel fairly confident that we will see and hear much more of the Replit team over time.
But for now, please keep adding a summary of your issues to my mega-post, as Francisco is going to ensure it is passed to the right internal teams for review: Summary of Replit issues - ALL MEMBERS, PLEASE CONTRIBUTE ASAP - Bugs - Replit Community Forum
That banned word which is the opposite of “long”
Totally unrelated to above, but Francisco is going to fix this platform to ensure we can use “that word”!! ![]()
![]()