My Replit App Development Workflow for Non-Coders to Increase Success Rate

I have seen many posts recently about the frustration with agent.

A very common complaint seemed to be the following:

  1. Agent is not great at building complex apps
  2. When Agent is adding new features, it breaks the old features.

Then you find yourself stuck in an endless loop while slowly dying inside…

If this describes you, this post is for you!

As of early 2025, AI excels at creating simple functions but struggles with building complex applications in one go. Through trial and error, I’ve developed a workflow that significantly improves success rates by breaking down features and building them incrementally.

Planning Phase: Defining MVP

Start by listing all desired features, then categorize them into:

  • Serial features (those that build upon each other)
  • Parallel features (those that work independently)

Create a tree diagram to visualize feature dependencies. For example:

App
├── Authentication (Parallel)
│   ├── Basic Login
│   ├── Password Reset
│   └── OAuth
└── Data Processing (Parallel)
    ├── Input Validation (Serial)
    ├── Data Analysis (Serial)
    └── Export Results (Serial)

Building Phase

Key Rule: Don’t include all features in your initial prompt. Instead:

  1. Create separate Replit projects for each parallel feature
  2. Build and test each feature independently until functional
  3. Commit working code to GitHub immediately (trust me, this saves headaches!)

For parallel features with serial components:

  1. Build the core feature first
  2. Git commit when functional
  3. Create a new branch for each additional serial feature
  4. Test and commit after each successful feature addition
  5. Merge branches as appropriate

Finally, create a new Replit project to integrate everything. Pull all the working code as context and ask the AI to help combine the features.

Remember: Commit early, commit often. Your future self will thank you!

Hope this helps!

Bonus: if you find this helpful, you might find my recent long form post on AI interesting too.

14 Likes

This seems to make the most sense. The agent likes to throw candy at you by suggestion features and as a new users I ran after it and it caused headaches the close I got to the end of the project. Its frustrating because I had something really nice going it worked well, fast and I was so happy with it and it just nose dived, and because it forces you to open new chats you lose the reversal options if it breaks something and I got stuck. I’m just tired now my brain is fried and I have to take a long break.

4 Likes

The suggested workflow is definitely good, and it is similar to the way I use it, but your reply offers a very important distinction that I hope is noticed. It’s one thing for the user to ask too much of the Agent, but it is another thing entirely for the Agent to offer features to new users that it cannot successfully implement without breaking things.

Because the suggestions are coming from the Agent, It’s way too easy for a new user to think they can just check all the boxes without knowing confusion and spent credits may be the result.

Since the established logic is that we should only build the core version first, maybe the Agent should have a mode where it’s configured to just build the core MVP first by default and only then start offering to expand the app modularly to avoid doing too much at once.

6 Likes

Loved your process - I evolved a process close to that through iterative pain! One question for us Non-coders: How do you Git Commit?

2 Likes

Exactly, after getting a couple nights of sleep and resting I was able to get the agent and assistant to help me fix some of the issues, I think I may be close to fixing the server issues. The mess happened after it suggested to build analytics tracking platform that plugged into all my features, it installed express and then decided to port part of the site to express instead of running it all under next.js, and after a few other iterations, I realized it was a horrible idea and things started breaking down. it started having path issues and then startup issues and that’s where I have been. I finally removed all of the express code and am one by one having it re-map all the paths back to next.js and started seeing things come back up. Be careful guys I lost a week because of this and I’m still cleaning up the mess. Don’t always assume its ideas are good.

3 Likes

I have a great guy on my team who can go in and fix issues inside Replit when all else fails.

1 Like

Go to the Git Pannel on Replit! If you go to YouTube, and search Replit Git, there is a video showing you how to do it!

3 Likes

Really good point! I think this shows that AI coding’s barrier is still not low enough! Something for the team to work on!

2 Likes

When I created a “remixed” version of my work, believing it wouldn’t impact my original content, I was shocked to discover that it had overwritten my database. I had asked the agent multiple times if this would happen, and after receiving assurances that a new database would be created, I proceeded with the change. However, I later found out that they were using the same database.

This situation should never have occurred.

3 Likes

Any idea how to tell the new remixed version to NOT use the same database?

1 Like